US SEC and Ripple lawsuit is getting more intricate with time. Recently, the financial regulator has asked the jury for permission to file a 30-page opening brief and a 10-page reply brief in support of its objections to the court’s orders regarding the disclosure of the infamous Willian Hinman email. This is the another time that the agency has raised its bid to block the access to the speech in the Ripple case.
The confidential Hinman speech
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has been repeatedly refusing to disclose the emails by Willian Hinman. The mail, which is related to the 2018 speech, is argued to be carrying some confidential information. Some data suggests that the mail includes a statement related to Ethereum, the second most popular “cryptocurrency” in terms of market capitalization. At first, the agency argued that the emails are protected by deliberate process privilege (DPP). Hence, it cannot be availed to anyone.
Later in May, the jury again ordered the financial agency to release the imbibes of such controversial speech. A month later, the court asked to reconsider the DPP ruling, giving another blow to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s efforts to keep the speech under wraps.
Following the reconsideration part, the SEC began to claim that the speech were actually shielded by the attorney-client privilege since. This is because of the confidentiality of the documents. However, earlier this month the argument again was rejected by the court and also Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn determined that providing legal advice was not the paramount purpose of the discussion.
ALSO READ – Bitcoin Selling Pressure Bankrupting Companies
Ripple vs US SEC lawsuit is getting lengthy
The drafts related to the regulatory agency’s staff’s legal analysis of XRP contains their staff preliminary views during the Division of Enforcement’s investigation into Ripple and did not present a recommendation to the authority. However, Ripple asked access to other documents, which included 14 entries and three additional documents.
Following this confidentiality concerns, the lawsuit is getting more lengthy. According to some experts in the such a high stakes legal brawl between the regulators and the largest FinTech firm is expected to be dragged into the next year.
According to senator Brad Sherman, XRP was a security, attracting criticism from Stuart Alderoty, the general counsel of the FinTech firm.