Follow Us

Wash trades galore for 21 accounts as $4.4 billion EOS ICO goes bust

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

Multi-billion dollar ICO filled with wash trades between ETH and EOS 

  • EOS ICO was filled with wash trades to manipulate prices 
  • Ether accounts also part of the trade practice during the industry’s largest initial coin offering (ICO)
  • Account owners were not disclosed but accounted for almost a quarter of EOS purchases  

New research has revealed more insight into the crypto business’ biggest ever token deal, claiming that unfairness might have been forthcoming during EOS’ starting coin offering (ICO) four years prior. 

Specialists from the University of Texas have raised new concerns in regards to’s record $4.362-billion ICO for the EOS blockchain in 2017 and 2018. The exceptionally expected venture was upheld by industry heavyweights, including PayPal prime supporter Peter Thiel, close by extremely rich person mutual funds supervisors Alan Howard and Louis Bacon. 

The examination doesn’t blame itself for any bad behavior, and the organization has referred to a report expressing there was no proof it was included. 

Wash trading a key part 

On Tuesday, educator John Griffin of the Austin McCombs School of Business and monetary investigation firm Integra FEC distributed their discoveries in a paper named Were ETH and EOS Repeatedly Recycled during the EOS Initial Coin Offering” — asserting that wash-exchanging assumed a key part EOS’ value revelation. 

As per the paper and illustrated in an examination by Bloomberg, EOS was purportedly wash-exchanged on the Binance and Bitfinex digital currency trades with an end goal to falsely blow up the costs. Wash-exchanging depicts the interaction where an element at the same time goes about as the purchaser and merchant for a similar resource for misleadingly support volume or control costs. 

Griffin composed that counterfeit interest from suspect records provoked the deception of interest for the token and pushed costs up: 

To start with, it straightforwardly controlled EOS’s contribution cost up through the additional purchasing and expanded the market worth of the token. Second, it made the bogus impression of the worth of the symbol which tempted others to need to buy the ICO token.

Ether accounts 

The examination purportedly distinguished 21 records that reused EOS tokens during the ICO. Assets distinguished as suspect added up to 1.2 million Ether (ETH) worth around $815 million at that point. Ether was the sole digital money used to purchase EOS during the drawn out ICO. 

The investigation asserts that Ethereum accounts were made to more than once buy EOS over the long haul. It asserts that a critical piece of the Ether raised during the symbolic deal seems to have been reused by moving the ICO commitments through a progression of muddling mediator accounts lastly showing up at Bitfinex.

2.895 million Ether ($1.721 billion USD), or 39% of the Ether brought up in the crowdsale, are likewise followed from the ICO crowdsale wallet back to Bitfinex.

Griffin didn’t distinguish the proprietors of the records or blame with respect to the supposed wash-exchanging; however noticed that these dubious records represented very nearly a fourth of EOS buys before the finish of the crowdsale.

Robert C. Hockett, teacher of law at Cornell Law School, said that he worked for over one month on the story close by news source Bloomberg, which distributed its discoveries on Thursday. 

As per Bloomberg, reacted to the paper by referring to a July archive composed by law office Clifford Chance LLP that attested there was no proof that bought tokens on the essential market.The token is right now exchanging for $5, down 77% from its April 2018 unequaled high of $22.70.

A similar John Griffin distributed a paper in October 2019 named “Is Bitcoin Really Untethered?” that guaranteed the main stablecoin Tether (USDT) was wash-exchanged to impact Bitcoin (BTC) costs during the 2017 positively trending market.

Control or something else, EOS has generally become undesirable with crypto brokers and financial backers. Since positioning among the best five crypto resources by market capitalization in mid-2018, EOS has since tumbled to rank 35th. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Download our App for getting faster updates at your fingertips.


We Recommend

Top Rated Cryptocurrency Exchange

Update Required Flash plugin