Home
News
- Making such decisions based on political expediency, according to Hoskinson, generates a lot of complexity that a $2 trillion business does not deserve. He continued, It’s just damaging to everyone, and it’s not partisan; it’s just a matter of clarity.
- While Ripple has continued to utilise this point to emphasise that XRP would be included in the same category, the SEC has since reversed its opinion.
- The SEC has asked the digital asset market to follow the same securities laws as traditional finance. Many people believe that this isn’t always the greatest method.
In the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs, there are always new twists and turns. One issue that keeps coming up is William Hinman’s comments as the SEC’s former Director of Corporation Finance.
Generates A Lot Of Complexity That A $2 Trillion Business Does Not Deserve
Hinman stated in a 2018 lecture that Ether is not a security. While Ripple has continued to utilise this point to emphasise that XRP would be included in the same category, the SEC has since reversed its opinion. Nonetheless, it cannot be denied that the speech was widely regarded as the SEC’s official viewpoint. Its subsequent U-turns have made the industry dizzy. Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson had a similar sentiment during a recent AMA, adding that the exec’s flip-flopping has fostered more ambiguity than ever before. Hoskinson said that it is unfair to the industry for regulators to constantly changing their minds.
You can publish a statement after the fact if it’s a personal perspective, but you can’t just let it sit, let opinions be written out and the industry move on, and then alter your mind because it’s convenient for a particular enforcement case you’re working on. Making such decisions based on political expediency, according to Hoskinson, generates a lot of complexity that a $2 trillion business does not deserve. He continued, It’s just damaging to everyone, and it’s not partisan; it’s just a matter of clarity. When you’re in an industry, you want to know what the rules are, but if they’re constantly changing and indiscernible, or staged in such a manner that compliance is impossible, you regulate it out of existence.
The crypto-exec, however, did not place the entire blame for the issue on regulatory organisations like the SEC or even the CFTC. Especially since they are following the playbook laid down by laws that have been deemed inadequate by the majority.
ALSO READ: Charles Hoskinson to stabilize ADA interest rates
The SEC Has Asked The Digital Asset Market To Follow The Same Securities Laws As Traditional Finance
While a well-publicized Congressional hearing for top executives of cryptocurrency companies took place in the United States last December, the government has yet to establish any legislation governing this asset class. As a result, the SEC has asked the digital asset market to follow the same securities laws as traditional finance. Many people believe that this isn’t always the greatest method. President Joe Biden, on the other hand, is anticipated to release an executive order on supervision as soon as this week. This is said to be for the purpose of instructing several authorities to investigate the asset class and its industry before developing a government-wide policy to regulate digital assets.
Nancy J. Allen is a crypto enthusiast, with a major in macroeconomics and minor in business statistics. She believes that cryptocurrencies inspire people to be their own banks, and step aside from traditional monetary exchange systems. She is also intrigued by blockchain technology and its functioning. She frequently researches, and posts content on the top altcoins, their theoretical working principles and technical price predictions.
