Apple was found to have violated the laws, a California court ruling over Apple’s action against epic games where developers were not supposed to use in-app payment methods as well as alternative payment methods which also includes a commission of about 30%. United States Court of Appeals for the ninth circuit (for the ninth circuit in United States courts there are 15 federal judicial districts appeal court bankruptcy courts and associated administrative units provide various court facilities) ruling on 24th April over Apple-epic games. 

Tim Sweeney tweeted on 25th April, “Apple prevailed at the 9th Circuit Court. Though the court upheld the ruling that Apple’s restraints have “a substantial anticompetitive effect that harms consumers”, they found we didn’t prove our Sherman Act case.”

Apple’s anti-steering policy 

Epic Games(creator of Fortnite) faced issues due to Apple’s policies. Apple’s anti-steering provision is a policy that states that iOS developers are not permitted to communicate through in-app links or other mechanisms for out-of-payment methods which leads to the prohibition of outside payment in epic games.

The policy resulted in increased costs for the Epic subsidiary app(a separate entity that works under the parent company or for another corporation) courts say they also prohibited the users from being Epic games users

By supporting the lower court decision from 2021, the court said Apple’s anti-steering provision harmed Epic games

Court ruling over Apple’s anti-steering policy

Looking forward to the case, the court ruled that if users were aware of Apple’s 30% commission, users might converse for Epic’s 12% commission rate which is much lower than Apple’s.

Court also included that if the policy may not be barred,  epic could earn more revenue, by using the competitor suit “tether test” and consumer suit “balancing test”, policy resulted in halting revenues of Epic Games and was unfair towards Epic Games

Court ruled in favor of Apple on most of the issues but this time it failed in argument and anti-steering policy shouldn’t be applicable on epic games as it terminated epic games ios developer account in 2020.

After court ruling in favor of Epic Games Tim Sweeney Tweeted, “Fortunately, the court’s positive decision rejecting Apple’s anti-steering provisions frees iOS developers to send consumers to the web to do business with them directly there. We’re working on the next steps.”

The Court’s decision against the policy may clear further paths for digital assets like cryptocurrency and NFT(Non-Fungible Token), and projects may include more functionalities to IOS apps.

Conclusion

Court ruling on Apple’s anti-steering policy which falls in the favor of epic games may also result in increasing functionalities of cryptocurrency and NFTs. Apple’s leading brand not only prohibited developers but also users had to pay extra commission fees of 30% in spite of 12%. Including creators of cryptocurrencies and NFT will be able to earn more because of this ruling as they will not face the taxation of 30% implemented by Apple, laws will be there which may provide more benefits to creators

Andrew Smith

Andrew is a blockchain developer who developed his interest in cryptocurrencies while pursuing his post-graduation major in blockchain development. He is a keen observer of details and shares his passion for writing, along with coding. His backend knowledge about blockchain helps him give a unique perspective to his writing skills, and a reliable craft at explaining the concepts such as blockchain programming, languages ​​and token minting. He also frequently shares technical details and performance indicators of ICOs and IDOs.