Home
News
- 1 IRS postpones enforcement of new crypto asset reporting rules under the Infrastructure Bill.
- 2 A temporary halt aims to clarify regulations before finalizing compliance requirements.
- 3 Critics warn of increased tax evasion during the interim period with loosened oversight.
The cryptocurrency industry received welcome, albeit temporary, relief as the IRS announced a pause on enforcing expanded reporting requirements for digital assets established under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
The Act passed in 2021, contained a provision redefining cryptocurrencies as “cash equivalents” for tax reporting purposes. This requires businesses to report digital asset transactions exceeding $10,000 to the IRS, bringing them in line with existing rules for fiat cash transactions.
IRS Delays Crypto Reporting Amid Confusion
With the law set to take effect on January 1, 2023, the IRS has now declared that enforcement of the new requirements will be postponed until final regulations are established. The delay aims to provide additional clarity around the implications of the law before regulated entities must adhere to the revised standards.
In a joint statement, the Treasury Department and IRS affirmed that more time was needed to formulate appropriate guidelines:
“The Treasury Department and IRS recognize that implementing the new reporting requirements and clarifying related rules involves complex technical considerations that require additional guidance.”
The postponement is a relief to cryptocurrency brokers, exchanges, and custodians who would have been subject to expanded reporting under the new classification.
However, the IRS emphasized that existing rules for cash transactions remain unchanged. Businesses must submit Form 8300 reports on cash payments exceeding $10,000 within 15 days.
Heightened Scrutiny On Crypto Industry Players
While enforcement is on hold, the roadmap suggests increased oversight for cryptocurrency intermediaries. The law mandates that entities, such as exchanges and wallet providers, collect and verify sensitive transaction data, including names, addresses, and social security numbers.
Perhaps most contentiously, they may also be compelled to report these “transmittal details” to the IRS, raising privacy concerns. In response, the Treasury and IRS have promised a transparent process:
“Treasury and the IRS intend to follow typical notice and comment procedures…providing the public an opportunity to comment both in writing and at a public hearing.”
Despite this pledge of openness, some critics warn the collection of customer identities could have a chilling effect, hindering adoption and innovation within the nascent crypto asset market.
Risk of Tax Evasion During Reporting Gap
Meanwhile, the delayed enforcement poses risks, as experts caution it could lead to reduced compliance and increased tax evasion during the interim period.
With oversight lax and regulations in flux, critics argue that taxpayers may exploit this window to avoid properly reporting digital asset transactions.
However, others contend the new requirements were overly broad and that the added time will enable more nuanced rules that target abuse while supporting ethical crypto use cases.
The ongoing reporting saga illustrates the complexity of regulating borderless cryptocurrencies within existing legal frameworks. As the IRS seeks to clarify digital asset policy, it must balance protecting tax revenue and enabling technological innovation.
With public input pending and enforcement on pause, uncertainties remain regarding the trajectory of crypto oversight. However, the engaged approach signals that the U.S. aims to craft prudent regulation through collaboration with industry stakeholders. The final shape of the emerging digital asset reporting infrastructure will ultimately depend on the details of the proposed policy and the feedback generated through public response.
Conclusion
The temporary reporting reprieve offers some breathing room, but enhanced oversight of cryptocurrencies seems inevitable. As the IRS works to modernize compliance standards for the digital age, officials emphasize a willingness to take a measured approach.
While the details remain undetermined, one thing is clear – open communication will be key to developing prudent regulations that allow ethical crypto innovation to flourish.
For an industry predicated on decentralization, this period of centralized policy formation will profoundly shape the landscape in which cryptocurrencies operate and evolve.
With a background in journalism, Ritika Sharma has worked with many reputed media firms focusing on general news such as politics and crime. She joined The Coin Republic as a reporter for crypto, and found a great passion for cryptocurrency, Web3, NFTs and other digital assets. She spends a lot of time researching and delving deeper into these concepts around the clock, and is a strong advocate for women in STEM.
