- Joseph Lubin says ETH could serve as a store of value on Ethereum news amid inflation and volatility.
- Vitalik Buterin favors ETH’s store-of-value role over relying on fee burns for value.
- Lubin cites ETH’s collateral and stablecoin uses, plus quantum safety by 2027–28.
According to the latest Ethereum news, Joseph Lubin has said that ETH could serve as a store of value as inflation and economic volatility threaten the purchasing power of traditional money.
His argument places Ethereum’s monetary role alongside gold and Bitcoin while highlighting the network’s utility, collateral uses, and resistance to censorship.
The Ethereum co-founder also described ETH in an X post as programmable and widely used across Ethereum’s financial network. His remarks followed Vitalik Buterin’s case for focusing on ETH as a store of value rather than a fee-burning token.
Ethereum News Turns to Stability Beyond Fee Burning
Vitalik Buterin said the case for ETH as a fee-burning asset had never been as strong as it appeared. He argued that making fee burns the main measure of ETH’s value could require changes that conflict with decentralization and resistance to capture.
He also said Ethereum should retain EIP-1559, which includes a burn mechanism. However, he wrote that burn levels below a breaking point should not be a cause for concern.
Buterin linked Ethereum’s decentralization and CROPS principles censorship and capture resistance, open-source development, privacy, and security to its long-term resilience. He argued that these properties strengthen ETH’s store-of-value case by supporting network stability rather than relying primarily on transaction-fee burns.
In his view, that feature makes the store-of-value role relevant beyond ideological arguments. He also said stability could become more valuable during disruption from artificial intelligence.
Lubin’s remarks on the Ethereum news set out a case for ETH’s monetary properties. He said ETH, like gold and Bitcoin, is not debt-based or credit-based money.
He also described Ethereum’s Layer 1 transactions as censorship-resistant, including transactions involving decentralized finance programs. Lubin said well-formed transactions are guaranteed to execute.
Lubin Points to ETH’s Network Uses
Lubin said ETH is relatively inexpensive to hold and store securely. He also argued that Ethereum transactions can handle transfers ranging from one dollar to billions.
His post described ETH as disinflationary, with supply becoming deflationary during periods of high network activity. These claims formed part of his explanation for why he sees ETH as sound money.
He also pointed to ETH’s role on Ethereum news as collateral and its use across the Ethereum economy. Lubin said Ethereum hosts most stablecoin activity, with stablecoins serving as payment money and units of account. He linked that activity to a broader range of financial uses on the network. He did not provide transaction figures or a specific adoption timeline for those uses.
The post also addressed privacy and transparency. Lubin said financial instruments on Ethereum can be public or private, while remaining selectively disclosable and auditable.
He named VPNs, mix networks, shielded pools, Railgun, stealth addresses, Kohaku, and zero-knowledge proofs among available privacy tools. He also referenced Layer 2 networks and private permissioned EVM networks.
Ethereum Quantum-Security Forecast Faces 2029 Roadmap
Lubin also predicted that ETH would become resistant to quantum-computing threats by late 2027 or sometime in 2028.
He described the future asset as quantum-safe and AI-safe, although he did not establish technical criteria for the latter description.
The Ethereum Foundation’s Sept. 7 protocol roadmap provides a different timeframe. It targets full Layer 1 quantum resistance across execution, consensus and data by December 2029.
The Foundation identified several development stages involving post-quantum signatures, validator protections and network consensus.
These upgrades remain research and implementation priorities. Their eventual deployment depends on testing, developer coordination and successful network upgrades.
The Foundation also identified temporary security measures intended to protect network operation before complete quantum resistance arrives.
Lubin did not explain why his timeline was earlier than the Foundation’s published target. The difference does not establish that either forecast will become reality.
His broader outlook also connected Ethereum with artificial intelligence, tokenized assets and programmable financial agreements.
However, the proposals remain separate from current network performance and cryptocurrency valuations. Future adoption depends on application demand, security development and institutional participation.
For Ethereum news, the immediate development concerns how its co-founders frame ETH’s economic role. Their arguments favor financial utility and network resilience, while leaving monetary valuation and quantum readiness open to further evidence.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment or cybersecurity advice. Cryptocurrency prices are volatile, and proposed security upgrades remain subject to development risks. Readers should independently review official disclosures before making financial decisions.
